Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 3443 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 21% better in Hogwarts Legacy than FX-8120 - 93 vs 77 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $78.02 vs $240.0
- Up to 61% better value when playing Hogwarts Legacy than Core i9-11900F - $1.01 vs $2.58 per FPS
Hogwarts Legacy
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
93
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.58/FPS
39.14728682170542%
Price, $
$240
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361834 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
77
82.79569892473118%
Value, $/FPS
$1.01/FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361834 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |