Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 1293 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 84% better in Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 83 vs 45 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - $109.99 vs $265.0
- Up to 24% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i9-11900K - $2.44 vs $3.19 per FPS
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
83
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.19/FPS
76.48902821316614%
Price, $
$265
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for $265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348551 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
45
54.21686746987952%
Value, $/FPS
$2.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348552 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Single-Core
1168
49.26191480388022%
Multi-Core
5794
52.92290829375228%
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |