Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 654 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 26% better in Starfield than Celeron G3930 - 58 vs 46 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-9920X - $98.02 vs $595.0
- Up to 79% better value when playing Starfield than Core i9-9920X - $2.13 vs $10.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 51 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
58
100%
Value, $/FPS
$10.26/FPS
20.760233918128655%
Price, $
$595
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $595 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349818 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
46
79.3103448275862%
Value, $/FPS
$2.13/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349817 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
43.02901627742392%
Multi-Core
1043
11.046388477017581%
Intel Core i9-9920X | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
165 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |