Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3820 outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3820 is 253 days older than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i7-3820 - $128.04 vs $319.88
- Up to 59% better value when playing God of War than Core i7-3820 - $0.79 vs $1.95 per FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 95 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Performs up to 1% better in God of War than FX-6300 - 164 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 8 vs 6 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
163
99.39024390243902%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
100%
Price, $
$128.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $128.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348609 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
164
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.95/FPS
40.51282051282051%
Price, $
$319.88
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for $319.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348609 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i7-3820 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2012 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 130 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |