Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms the more expensive FX-6350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 1300X is 1550 days newer than the more expensive FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1300X - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
- Performs up to 34% better in Counter-Strike 2 than FX-6350 - 322 vs 240 FPS
- Up to 35% cheaper than FX-6350 - $65.23 vs $100.0
- Up to 52% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than FX-6350 - $0.2 vs $0.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
240
74.53416149068323%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
47.61904761904762%
Price, $
$100
65%
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361156 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
322
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$65.23
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $65.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361157 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 1300X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Vishera | Codename | Summit Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |