Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 2825 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 42% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600 - $64.03 vs $110.99
- Up to 34% better value when playing Ready or Not than Ryzen 5 3600 - $0.27 vs $0.41 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 17% better in Ready or Not than FX-8150 - 272 vs 233 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 12 vs 8 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
233
85.66176470588235%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361062 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
272
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
65.85365853658537%
Price, $
$110.99
57%
FPS Winner
Buy for $110.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361062 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |