Key Differences
In short — FX-6350 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-6350 is 565 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 36% cheaper than FX-6350 - $64.03 vs $100.0
- Up to 37% better value when playing Ready or Not than FX-6350 - $0.27 vs $0.43 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Performs up to 1% better in Ready or Not than FX-8150 - 235 vs 233 FPS
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
233
99.14893617021276%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361027 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
235
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
62.7906976744186%
Price, $
$100
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361027 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
AMD FX-8150 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Zambezi | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |