Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 2200G outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 2200G is 2315 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 51% cheaper than Ryzen 3 2200G - $64.03 vs $130.0
- Up to 47% better value when playing Ready or Not than Ryzen 3 2200G - $0.27 vs $0.51 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Performs up to 9% better in Ready or Not than FX-8150 - 253 vs 233 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
233
92.09486166007905%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361147 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
253
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
52.94117647058824%
Price, $
$130
49%
FPS Winner
Buy for $130 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361148 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raven Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |