Buy on Amazon
$64.03
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $549
Availability
MSRP in USD: $549
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 2150 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 42% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $64.03 vs $109.99
- Up to 36% better value when playing Ready or Not than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $0.27 vs $0.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 11% better in Ready or Not than FX-8150 - 259 vs 233 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 16 vs 8 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FX-8150
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
233
89.96138996138995%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.03
100%
Value Winner
AMD FX-Series FX-8150 CPU Used 8-Core 8-Thread Desktop Processor 3.6 GHz 8M 125W Socket AM3+
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361029 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
259
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
64.28571428571429%
Price, $
$109.99
58%
FPS Winner
AMD YD190XA8AEWOF Ryzen Threadripper 1900X (8-core/16-thread) Desktop Processor
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361030 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FX-8150
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Zambezi | Codename | Whitehaven |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
