Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 1693 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - $64.03 vs $145.0
- Up to 36% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-6900K - $0.27 vs $0.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 125 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 47% better in Counter-Strike 2 than FX-8150 - 343 vs 233 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 16 vs 8 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
233
67.93002915451895%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361290 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
343
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
64.28571428571429%
Price, $
$145
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for $145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361291 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Broadwell-E |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |