Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Athlon 3000G outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2584 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 16% better in Far Cry 6 than FX-8320 - 106 vs 91 FPS
- Up to 37% cheaper than FX-8320 - $63.83 vs $102.02
- Up to 46% better value when playing Far Cry 6 than FX-8320 - $0.6 vs $1.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
91
85.84905660377359%
Value, $/FPS
$1.12/FPS
53.57142857142857%
Price, $
$102.02
62%
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360824 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
106
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.83
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $63.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360825 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Athlon |
Vishera | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |