Buy on Amazon
$102.02
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $169
Availability
MSRP in USD: $169
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $129
Availability
MSRP in USD: $129
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 1300X is 1738 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1300X - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
- Performs up to 12% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than FX-8320 - 121 vs 108 FPS
- Up to 36% cheaper than FX-8320 - $65.23 vs $102.02
- Up to 43% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than FX-8320 - $0.54 vs $0.94 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
108
89.25619834710744%
Value, $/FPS
$0.94/FPS
57.446808510638306%
Price, $
$102.02
63%
OEM AMD FX-8320 Octa-core (8 Core) 3.50 GHz Processor - Socket AM3+ Pack
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360826 minutes ago
Ryzen 3 1300X
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
121
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Price, $
$65.23
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Large Scale Integration Ryzen 3 1300X R3 1300X 3.5 GHz Gaming Zen 0.014 Quad- Quad-Thread CPU Processor YD130XBBM4KAE Socket AM4 Implementing Multi-Threaded Operations
Buy for $65.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360827 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Ryzen 3 1300X
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 1300X |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2017 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Vishera | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 17.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
