Key Differences
In short — FX-8320 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-8320 is 377 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Performs up to 1% better in War Thunder than FX-8150 - 130 vs 129 FPS
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 37% cheaper than FX-8320 - $64.03 vs $102.02
- Up to 36% better value when playing War Thunder than FX-8320 - $0.5 vs $0.78 per FPS
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
130
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
64.1025641025641%
Price, $
$102.02
62%
FPS Winner
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360841 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
129
99.23076923076923%
Value, $/FPS
$0.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360841 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
AMD FX-8320 | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Vishera | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |