Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper FX-8370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3046 days newer than the cheaper FX-8370.
Advantages of AMD FX-8370
- Up to 53% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $276.99 vs $591.89
- Up to 41% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $2.5 vs $4.26 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 25% better in Elden Ring than FX-8370 - 139 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than AMD FX-8370 - 120 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8370 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
FPS
111
79.85611510791367%
Value, $/FPS
$2.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$276.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $276.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360816 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
139
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.26/FPS
58.68544600938967%
Price, $
$591.89
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for $591.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360816 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8370 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |