Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 1132 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - $80.0 vs $145.0
- Up to 41% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i7-6900K - $0.5 vs $0.85 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 7% better in War Thunder than Ryzen 3 3200G - 171 vs 160 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 16 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
160
93.56725146198829%
Value, $/FPS
$0.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$80
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360448 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
171
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.85/FPS
58.82352941176471%
Price, $
$145
55%
FPS Winner
Buy for $145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360448 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1052
84.02555910543131%
Multi-Core
3013
42.3293059848272%
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Picasso | Codename | Broadwell-E |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |