Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 2740 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 16% better in Hogwarts Legacy than FX-8320 - 89 vs 77 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 32% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3300X - $102.02 vs $150.0
- Up to 22% better value when playing Hogwarts Legacy than Ryzen 3 3300X - $1.32 vs $1.69 per FPS
Hogwarts Legacy
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
89
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.69/FPS
78.10650887573965%
Price, $
$150
68%
FPS Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360463 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
77
86.51685393258427%
Value, $/FPS
$1.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$102.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360462 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | FX |
Matisse | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |