Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 2448 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 11% better in Sea of Thieves than FX-8320 - 227 vs 204 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 23% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3400G - $102.02 vs $132.0
- Up to 14% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Ryzen 5 3400G - $0.5 vs $0.58 per FPS
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
227
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
86.20689655172414%
Price, $
$132
77%
FPS Winner
Buy for $132 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360452 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
204
89.86784140969164%
Value, $/FPS
$0.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$102.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360451 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Picasso | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |