Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7600 is 490 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i5-7600 - $39.95 vs $99.0
- Up to 55% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i5-7600 - $0.19 vs $0.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-7600 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600
- Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield V than Celeron G3900 - 237 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
211
89.0295358649789%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349448 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
237
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
45.23809523809524%
Price, $
$99
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for $99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349449 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
42.316096139839765%
Multi-Core
992
26.02308499475341%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-7600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |