Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100T is 1096 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i3-9100T - $39.95 vs $99.0
- Up to 52% better value when playing Starfield than Core i3-9100T - $0.87 vs $1.8 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100T
- Performs up to 20% better in Starfield than Celeron G3900 - 55 vs 46 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
46
83.63636363636363%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349459 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
55
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.8/FPS
48.333333333333336%
Price, $
$99
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for $99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349461 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
48.29592684954281%
Multi-Core
992
31.214600377595975%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100T |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |