Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-3210 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-920 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-3210 is 1506 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-920.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Performs up to 0% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i7-920 - 274 vs 273 FPS
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i7-920 - $70.0 vs $90.0
- Up to 21% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i7-920 - $0.26 vs $0.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i7-920 - 55 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-920 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 8 vs 4 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
274
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349408 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FPS
273
99.63503649635037%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
78.78787878787878%
Price, $
$90
77%
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349408 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | Intel Core i7-920 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Bloomfield |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 130 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |