Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6400 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-6400 is 912 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i5-6400 - $70.0 vs $99.95
- Up to 25% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-6400 - $0.41 vs $0.55 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-6400 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-3210 - 181 vs 169 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
169
93.37016574585635%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349513 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
181
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
74.54545454545453%
Price, $
$99.95
70%
FPS Winner
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349514 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
509
45.81458145814582%
Multi-Core
1018
33.67515712868012%
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | Intel Core i5-6400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |