Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700T outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700T is 973 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i7-6700T - $70.0 vs $99.9
- Up to 26% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-6700T - $0.45 vs $0.61 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 6% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-3210 - 164 vs 155 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i3-3210 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 8 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
155
94.51219512195121%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349402 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
164
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
73.77049180327869%
Price, $
$99.9
70%
FPS Winner
Buy for $99.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349403 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |