Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7400 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7400 is 1463 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i5-7400 - $70.0 vs $110.0
- Up to 30% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than Core i5-7400 - $0.57 vs $0.81 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-7400 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400
- Performs up to 11% better in Far Cry 3 than Core i3-3210 - 135 vs 122 FPS
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
122
90.37037037037037%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349408 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
135
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.81/FPS
70.37037037037037%
Price, $
$110
63%
FPS Winner
Buy for $110 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349409 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
509
43.28231292517007%
Multi-Core
1018
31.497524752475247%
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | Intel Core i5-7400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |