Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 1266 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 26% cheaper than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $70.0 vs $94.05
- Up to 21% better value when playing Valheim than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $0.37 vs $0.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 55 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 4% better in Valheim than Core i3-3210 - 198 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 12 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
190
95.95959595959596%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349406 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
198
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
78.72340425531915%
Price, $
$94.05
74%
FPS Winner
Buy for $94.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349408 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
509
43.13559322033898%
Multi-Core
1018
18.576642335766426%
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |