Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100T outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100T is 2069 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i3-9100T - $70.0 vs $99.0
- Up to 21% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i3-9100T - $0.57 vs $0.72 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100T
- Performs up to 12% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i3-3210 - 138 vs 123 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i3-3210 - 35 vs 55 Watts
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
123
89.13043478260869%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349400 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
138
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.72/FPS
79.16666666666666%
Price, $
$99
70%
FPS Winner
Buy for $99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349401 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
509
42.31088944305902%
Multi-Core
1018
32.032724984266835%
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100T |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |