Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6800K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6800K is 1246 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i7-6800K - $70.0 vs $108.0
- Up to 30% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i7-6800K - $0.26 vs $0.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 55 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Performs up to 6% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i3-3210 - 290 vs 274 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 12 vs 4 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
274
94.48275862068965%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349407 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
290
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
70.27027027027027%
Price, $
$108
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for $108 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349409 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
509
41.58496732026144%
Multi-Core
1018
17.982688570923866%
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |