Buy on Amazon
$70
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G4900 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2641 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 2% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-2400S - 120 vs 118 FPS
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i5-2400S - $50.0 vs $70.0
- Up to 29% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-2400S - $0.42 vs $0.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400S - 54 vs 65 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-2400S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
118
98.33333333333333%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
71.1864406779661%
Price, $
$70
71%
Intel Core i5-2400S Quad-Core Processor 2.5 GHz 6 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623I52400S
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350016 minutes ago
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
120
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$50
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Celeron® G4900 Desktop Processor 2 Core 3.1GHz LGA1151 300 Series 54W BX80684G4900
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350016 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-2400S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2400S | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
