Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 18% better in Battlefield V than Celeron G3930 - 251 vs 212 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $98.02 vs $490.0
- Up to 76% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i9-10900K - $0.46 vs $1.95 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 51 vs 125 Watts
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
251
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.95/FPS
23.58974358974359%
Price, $
$490
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for $490 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349450 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
212
84.4621513944223%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349449 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
34.76272155517439%
Multi-Core
1043
11.382734912146677%
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |