Key Differences
In short — FX-9590 outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-9590 is 231 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Performs up to 1% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-8320 - 128 vs 127 FPS
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 66% cheaper than FX-9590 - $102.02 vs $298.02
- Up to 66% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than FX-9590 - $0.8 vs $2.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 125 vs 220 Watts
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
128
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.33/FPS
34.33476394849785%
Price, $
$298.02
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348964 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
127
99.21875%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
100%
Price, $
$102.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348964 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FX-9590 | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Vishera | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |