Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6850K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6850K is 273 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i7-6850K - $39.95 vs $120.0
- Up to 59% better value when playing Starfield than Core i7-6850K - $0.87 vs $2.14 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i7-6850K - 51 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6850K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6850K
- Performs up to 22% better in Starfield than Celeron G3900 - 56 vs 46 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
46
82.14285714285714%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349454 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
56
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.14/FPS
40.654205607476634%
Price, $
$120
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349456 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
45.82018927444795%
Multi-Core
992
17.04174540456966%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i7-6850K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Broadwell E |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |