Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-6400 is 61 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i5-6400 - $39.95 vs $99.95
- Up to 60% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i5-6400 - $0.14 vs $0.35 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-6400 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Performs up to 4% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Celeron G3900 - 287 vs 276 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
276
96.16724738675958%
Value, $/FPS
$0.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349454 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
287
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
40.00000000000001%
Price, $
$99.95
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349456 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
52.29522952295229%
Multi-Core
992
32.81508435329143%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-6400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |