Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Athlon 3000G outperforms the more expensive Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Athlon 3000G is 1051 days newer than the more expensive Celeron G3930.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 4% better in Borderlands 3 than Celeron G3930 - 207 vs 199 FPS
- Up to 35% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - $63.83 vs $98.02
- Up to 37% better value when playing Borderlands 3 than Celeron G3930 - $0.31 vs $0.49 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3930 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
199
96.1352657004831%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
63.26530612244898%
Price, $
$98.02
65%
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349759 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
207
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.83
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $63.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349761 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
63.53187042842215%
Multi-Core
1043
52.810126582278485%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Athlon |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |