Buy on Amazon
$98.02
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $169
Availability
MSRP in USD: $169
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G3930 outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G3930 is 1533 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 2% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-8320 - 120 vs 118 FPS
- Up to 4% cheaper than FX-8320 - $98.02 vs $102.02
- Up to 5% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-8320 - $0.82 vs $0.86 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
120
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3930 Dual-core (2 Core) 2.90 GHz Processor - Socket H4 LGA-1151OEM Pack - 512 KB
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350015 minutes ago
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
118
98.33333333333333%
Value, $/FPS
$0.86/FPS
95.34883720930232%
Price, $
$102.02
96%
OEM AMD FX-8320 Octa-core (8 Core) 3.50 GHz Processor - Socket AM3+ Pack
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350016 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | FX |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
