Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 471 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 2% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600X - $98.02 vs $99.97
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 8% better in Sons Of The Forest than Celeron G3930 - 100 vs 93 FPS
- Up to 5% better value when playing Sons Of The Forest than Celeron G3930 - $1.0 vs $1.05 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 12 vs 2 threads
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
93
93%
Value, $/FPS
$1.05/FPS
95.23809523809523%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358149 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
100
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.97
98%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358151 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
49.15117219078415%
Multi-Core
1043
19.817594527835837%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |