Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-2600K outperforms the more expensive Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-2600K is 2186 days older than the more expensive Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600K - 51 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Performs up to 1% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G3930 - 121 vs 120 FPS
- Up to 29% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - $70.0 vs $98.02
- Up to 29% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G3930 - $0.58 vs $0.82 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
120
99.17355371900827%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
70.73170731707317%
Price, $
$98.02
71%
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349773 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
121
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349773 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
91.01796407185628%
Multi-Core
1043
44.95689655172414%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i7-2600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |