Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3470 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3470 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 1677 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3470.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Core i5-3470 - 51 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470
- Up to 30% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - $69.0 vs $98.02
- Up to 30% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G3930 - $0.57 vs $0.82 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
120
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
69.51219512195121%
Price, $
$98.02
70%
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349755 minutes ago
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349755 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
97.7491961414791%
Multi-Core
1043
56.68478260869565%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i5-3470 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |