Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-750 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-750 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 2674 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-750.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 3% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-750 - 120 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-750 - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-750 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-750
- Up to 23% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - $75.0 vs $98.02
- Up to 22% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G3930 - $0.64 vs $0.82 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
120
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
78.04878048780488%
Price, $
$98.02
76%
FPS Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349764 minutes ago
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349764 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i5-750 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |