Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 1910 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 2% better in Borderlands 3 than FX-8150 - 199 vs 195 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 35% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - $64.03 vs $98.02
- Up to 33% better value when playing Borderlands 3 than Celeron G3930 - $0.33 vs $0.49 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
199
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
67.34693877551021%
Price, $
$98.02
65%
FPS Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349876 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
195
97.98994974874373%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349877 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |