Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 1463 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 2% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-3210 - 93 vs 91 FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i3-3210 - 51 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 29% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - $70.0 vs $98.02
- Up to 27% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron G3930 - $0.77 vs $1.05 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
93
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.05/FPS
73.33333333333333%
Price, $
$98.02
71%
FPS Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349878 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
91
97.84946236559139%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349878 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i3-3210 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |