Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms the more expensive Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 1300X is 205 days newer than the more expensive Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 1300X - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 1300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
- Performs up to 12% better in Rust than Celeron G3930 - 181 vs 161 FPS
- Up to 33% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - $65.23 vs $98.02
- Up to 41% better value when playing Rust than Celeron G3930 - $0.36 vs $0.61 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
161
88.95027624309392%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
59.01639344262295%
Price, $
$98.02
66%
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349750 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
181
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$65.23
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $65.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349751 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
55.42388331814039%
Multi-Core
1043
33.03769401330377%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 1300X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |