Buy on Amazon
$244.77
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $549
Availability
MSRP in USD: $549
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 973 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 18% better in War Thunder than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 196 vs 166 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $109.99 vs $244.77
- Up to 47% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i9-10900F - $0.66 vs $1.25 per FPS
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
196
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.25/FPS
52.800000000000004%
Price, $
$244.77
44%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for $244.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349098 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
166
84.6938775510204%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
Value Winner
AMD YD190XA8AEWOF Ryzen Threadripper 1900X (8-core/16-thread) Desktop Processor
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349099 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Single-Core
1168
69.68973747016707%
Multi-Core
5794
68.76335153097554%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
