Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-9590 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1940 days newer than the cheaper FX-9590.
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Up to 44% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $298.02 vs $530.0
- Up to 39% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $2.5 vs $4.08 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 9% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-9590 - 130 vs 119 FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 180 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 24 vs 8 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
119
91.53846153846153%
Value, $/FPS
$2.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$298.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350421 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
130
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.08/FPS
61.274509803921575%
Price, $
$530
56%
FPS Winner
Buy for $530 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350422 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Vishera | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |