Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms the more expensive FX-9590 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 1105 days newer than the more expensive FX-9590.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 25% better in War Thunder than FX-9590 - 167 vs 134 FPS
- Up to 68% cheaper than FX-9590 - $94.05 vs $298.02
- Up to 75% better value when playing War Thunder than FX-9590 - $0.56 vs $2.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 140 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 12 vs 8 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
134
80.23952095808383%
Value, $/FPS
$2.22/FPS
25.225225225225223%
Price, $
$298.02
31%
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348857 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
167
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.56/FPS
100%
Price, $
$94.05
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $94.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348858 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
FX | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Vishera | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |