Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 298 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $80.0 vs $244.77
- Up to 65% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i9-10900F - $0.24 vs $0.68 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 7% better in Overwatch 2 than Ryzen 3 3200G - 360 vs 336 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 20 vs 4 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
336
93.33333333333333%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$80
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361005 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
360
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
35.29411764705882%
Price, $
$244.77
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for $244.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361004 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1052
62.76849642004774%
Multi-Core
3013
35.75836695941135%
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |