Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 1410 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 17% better in War Thunder than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 196 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $94.05 vs $244.77
- Up to 55% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i9-10900F - $0.56 vs $1.25 per FPS
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
196
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.25/FPS
44.800000000000004%
Price, $
$244.77
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for $244.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349095 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
167
85.20408163265306%
Value, $/FPS
$0.56/FPS
100%
Price, $
$94.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $94.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349095 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1180
70.40572792362768%
Multi-Core
5480
65.03679088535486%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |