Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 298 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $110.99 vs $244.77
- Up to 54% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i9-10900F - $0.45 vs $0.98 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 0% better in Battlefield V than Ryzen 5 3600 - 249 vs 248 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 20 vs 12 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
248
99.59839357429718%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$110.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $110.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348975 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
249
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.98/FPS
45.91836734693878%
Price, $
$244.77
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for $244.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348975 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1597
95.28639618138425%
Multi-Core
6884
81.69950154284358%
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Matisse | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |