Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7600 is 1463 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600
- Performs up to 11% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-3210 - 131 vs 118 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i5-7600 - $70.0 vs $99.0
- Up to 22% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-7600 - $0.59 vs $0.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-7600 - 55 vs 65 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
131
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.76/FPS
77.63157894736842%
Price, $
$99
70%
FPS Winner
Buy for $99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349951 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
118
90.07633587786259%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349950 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
509
37.072104879825204%
Multi-Core
1018
26.705141657922347%
Intel Core i5-7600 | vs | Intel Core i3-3210 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |