Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2198 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 104% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i3-3210 - 51 vs 25 FPS
- Up to 21% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i3-3210 - $2.2 vs $2.8 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - $70.0 vs $112.0
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
51
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$112
62%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361283 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
25
49.01960784313725%
Value, $/FPS
$2.8/FPS
78.57142857142858%
Price, $
$70
100%
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361282 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
509
36.937590711175616%
Multi-Core
1018
21.059164253206454%
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Core i3-3210 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |