Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6850K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6850K is 273 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6850K
- Performs up to 78% better in Immortals of Aveum than Celeron G3900 - 48 vs 27 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i7-6850K - $39.95 vs $120.0
- Up to 41% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i7-6850K - $1.48 vs $2.5 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i7-6850K - 51 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6850K doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
48
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.5/FPS
59.199999999999996%
Price, $
$120
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361372 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
27
56.25%
Value, $/FPS
$1.48/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361371 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
45.82018927444795%
Multi-Core
992
17.04174540456966%
Intel Core i7-6850K | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Broadwell E | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |