Buy on Amazon
$39.95
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $169
Availability
MSRP in USD: $169
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G3900 outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1043 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield V than FX-8320 - 211 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 61% cheaper than FX-8320 - $39.95 vs $102.02
- Up to 61% better value when playing Battlefield V than FX-8320 - $0.19 vs $0.49 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
211
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3900 2.8GHz Dual-Core Processor SR2HV LGA 1151 (CM8066201928610)
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349462 minutes ago
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
208
98.5781990521327%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
38.775510204081634%
Price, $
$102.02
39%
OEM AMD FX-8320 Octa-core (8 Core) 3.50 GHz Processor - Socket AM3+ Pack
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349462 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | FX |
| Skylake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
